DEPLOY

AI data centers

Do AI data centers use water?

Water-sourcing on the record for tracked campuses

Yes. Most use water to stay cool. But how much they use, and where it comes from, is different at almost every site.

A data center is a building full of computers, and computers make heat. Water is a cheap way to carry that heat away, so most data centers use some.

A growing number, though, are built to use almost none.

The numbers about how much water gets used come from outside research, and we point to it.

What we track that almost no one else does is how each data center we follow gets its cooling water. Most of the ones that say how they cool are built to use very little.

✓ Last verified not yet on record5 sources

Find out instantly when it changes.

Verified changes only. We check the record and link every source. No marketing.

Yes. A data center is packed with computers, and computers give off heat. Water is a cheap way to carry that heat away, so most data centers use some.

But many new ones are built to use almost none. So the real answer is not the same for every site.

There are two kinds of water use here, and people mix them up all the time.

The first is the water the building itself uses to cool down. Often it lets the water evaporate, a little like sweat.

The second is the water used far away, at the power plants that make the building's electricity. For a data center on the regular power grid, this hidden amount is usually the bigger one.

We did not measure these amounts ourselves. The numbers on this page come from outside research, and we say who did each study.

Here is the part we track that almost no one else does: how each data center we follow gets its cooling water.

Some are cooled by air, or by dry systems, and use little or no water.

Some use a closed loop. The water goes around and around in a sealed system, so it only gets topped off now and then instead of being pulled in all the time.

Some use recycled water, or even seawater, so they stay off the drinking water supply.

The table below shows each one, with a link to where the fact came from.

One thing we do not have is an exact gallons-per-year number for a single site. Companies rarely share that. So we show how each site gets its water, and we point to the research for the big numbers, instead of making one up.

How the sites we track stay cool

We track 3,975 AI data centers. For the 544 biggest campuses we also record how they handle cooling water, and 94 of those tell us. Almost no one else keeps this. It is not a gallons number. It is the cooling method, site by site, with a source for each.

Disclose their approach
94
Air / dry, little or no water
11
Reclaimed or seawater
7
Water-minimizing in total
18

What is claimed, and who says it

Each box below says who the fact comes from. The last box is the honest limit of what we can answer.

How it works (from the Congressional Research Service)

Two kinds of water use

A data center makes heat, and water helps carry it off. Some of that water is used right at the building.

More of it is used far away, at the power plants that make the building's electricity. This federal report explains both.

For a site on the regular grid, the far-away amount is often the bigger one.

Read the proof: Congressional Research Service (R49057)

How much (from LBNL, UC Riverside, and EESI)

A lot overall, and hard to measure per use

US data centers used about 4.4 percent of the country's electricity in 2023, and that could reach 6.7 to 12 percent by 2028 (LBNL).

One study found that about half a liter of water is used for every 20 to 50 ChatGPT-style questions, though the exact number depends on what you count (UC Riverside).

When a site cools by letting water evaporate, about 80 percent of that water does not come back (EESI).

These are outside estimates, not our own measurements.

Read the proof: LBNL (US DOE), UC Riverside, EESI

What one real site looked like (public records)

The Dalles, Oregon: 355 million gallons

The town of The Dalles sued to keep Google's water use secret.

After it lost, the records showed Google's data centers there used about 355 million gallons in 2021, about 29 percent of the whole town's water.

It stands out because most sites never share a number like this.

Read the proof: Data Center Dynamics / The Oregonian

What we have, and what we do not

Where the water comes from, not how much

We track how each site we follow gets its cooling water, shown below.

We do not have an exact gallons number for a single site. Companies rarely share that.

So we show where the water comes from, and we point to the research for the big totals.

Air or dry cooling, little or no water

Cooled mostly by air, so it uses little or no water.

11 tracked campuses

11 tracked campuses
Alterra Marshall Technology & Energy CenterMarshallAir or dry cooling, little or no waterClosed-loop liquid cooling proposed to minimize water use; developer said it would not draw from Stuart Lake (reported, Dec 2025). No gpd figure sourced. Sources (3) →
Amazon Project Rainier Data Center (New Carlisle)New CarlisleAir or dry cooling, little or no waterUses free-air cooling about 90% of the year, switching to evaporative (water) cooling only when ambient temperature exceeds ~85F; cooling water is drawn from the New Carlisle aquifer, with Phase 1 permitted at ~1.6M gal/day and Amazon stating water is used in under 2% of hours annually. Sources (5) →
Google Mesa Data Center (Redhawk)MesaAir or dry cooling, little or no waterAir-cooled to minimize water consumption given regional water scarcity (Google) Sources (2) →
Meta Beaver Dam Data CenterBeaver DamAir or dry cooling, little or no waterDry cooling; Meta states no water demand for cooling once operational, with water restoration returning 100% of consumed water to local watersheds. Sources (2) →
Meta Hyperion Data Center (Richland Parish)DelhiAir or dry cooling, little or no waterOperator describes a closed-loop system circulating a glycol mixture through the data halls, with heat rejected via dry cooling for the majority of the year; a water permit is reported at roughly 23 MGD across six wells sized to peak-summer demand. Sources (9) →
Microsoft Fairwater Data Center (Mount Pleasant)Mount PleasantAir or dry cooling, little or no waterClosed-loop liquid cooling filled once at construction with no ongoing water draw and no evaporation across about 90% of capacity; the remaining ~10% uses outdoor-air cooling and taps water only during peak summer heat. Microsoft compares annual water use to a single restaurant. Sources (4) →
Polaris Forge 1 (Ellendale)EllendaleAir or dry cooling, little or no waterApplied Digital proprietary closed-loop / waterless cooling design. Sources (3) →
Polaris Forge 2 (Harwood)HarwoodAir or dry cooling, little or no waterApplied Digital proprietary closed-loop / waterless cooling design. Sources (3) →

Closed loop, sealed and reused

The water goes around in a sealed loop and only gets topped off now and then.

17 tracked campuses

17 tracked campuses
Compass Datacenters Red Oak Campus (DFW III)Red OakClosed loop, sealed and reusedClosed-loop water-cooling system that is not connected to the city utility line and, per city staff, uses less water annually than a Walmart Supercenter. Sources (3) →
Crusoe Childress CampusChildressClosed loop, sealed and reusedClosed-loop, non-evaporative liquid cooling to reduce water use. Sources (3) →
GW Ranch (Pacifico Energy)Fort StocktonClosed loop, sealed and reusedSelf-supplying, per the developer. Pacifico says the power generation system is self-sufficient and will itself produce water the data center can use. Local coverage notes the general move to closed-loop cooling, which still needs a large volume on initial fill and periodic refills. No water source, volume or permit figure has been published for the campus. Sources (7) →
Galaxy Helios Campus (CoreWeave)AftonClosed loop, sealed and reusedClosed loop, recirculating internally. Galaxy has put a figure of roughly 3,000 gallons a day per building on the same design at its McGregor campus, which it describes as built like Helios; no separate published figure exists for Helios itself. Sources (6) →
Lake Mariner Data CampusBarkerClosed loop, sealed and reusedClosed-loop cooling that does not draw from Lake Ontario despite the lakeside location and legacy coal-plant intake; the campus uses only a few gallons of utility water daily. Sources (4) →
Lancium Fort Stockton Clean CampusFort StocktonClosed loop, sealed and reusedClosed-loop, non-evaporative liquid cooling that recirculates a sealed water volume; once filled it requires no additional water for the life of the project. Sources (4) →
Microsoft Fairwater Atlanta / QTS Fayetteville CampusFayettevilleClosed loop, sealed and reusedClosed-loop liquid cooling consuming almost zero water; initial fill equivalent to what 20 homes use in a year, no evaporation, ~6-year loop life (Microsoft). Grid-only, no on-site generation and no UPS/gen-sets. Sources (3) →
Nebius Independence AI Factory CampusIndependenceClosed loop, sealed and reusedMunicipal water via city Courtney Bend Water Treatment plant; closed-loop cooling; one-time fill ~1M gal per 200MW building; recurring ~400,000-640,000 gal/year (city FAQ). Sources (3) →

Recycled water

Cooled with recycled water instead of drinking water.

5 tracked campuses

5 tracked campuses
AWS Madison County Data Center CampusesCantonRecycled waterTransitioning to recycled/treated wastewater cooling by 2027; $215M state loan funded wastewater treatment upgrades Sources (3) →
Project Kilby (Chevron / Microsoft)PecosRecycled waterBrackish groundwater rather than fresh. Kilby plans to run the plant on non-potable brackish groundwater to reduce demand on shared freshwater, and Chevron says it is working towards using treated produced water for Kilby and other Permian industrial uses over the coming years, to cut groundwater withdrawals further. Sources (4) →
STACK Stafford Technology CampusStaffordRecycled waterReclaimed water system for industrial cooling; project funds water/sewer upgrades eliminating $58M from Stafford County's Capital Improvement Program Sources (2) →
Switch Citadel Campus (Tahoe Reno)McCarran (Tahoe Reno Industrial Center)Recycled waterSupplied with reclaimed (treated effluent) water via a 16-mile pipeline from the Truckee Meadows Water Reclamation Facility; Switch states its cooling approach minimizes water dependence. Sources (4) →
xAI Colossus (Memphis)MemphisRecycled waterCooled with treated wastewater (about 3 million gallons/day) piped from the purpose-built Colossus Water Recycling Plant, avoiding an equivalent draw on Memphis drinking water; on-site power is from methane gas turbines. Sources (9) →

Seawater

Cooled with seawater, so it stays off the fresh water supply.

2 tracked campuses

2 tracked campuses
DataVolt NEOM Oxagon Net-Zero AI FactoryOxagonSeawaterNot published. The launch announcement commits to renewable power, net zero operation and unspecified advanced cooling technologies, but names no water source and gives no volume. On a Red Sea industrial site the plausible answer is desalination, which is exactly why it should not be assumed here. Sources (3) →
Reliance Jamnagar AI-Enabled Data CentreJamnagarSeawaterCooled with desalinated seawater from the Gulf of Kutch; Meta covers full cost of energy and water for the leased block. Sources (4) →

City drinking water

Uses regular city drinking water to cool, the kind that gets the most attention.

5 tracked campuses

5 tracked campuses
D-Wave Burnaby Quantum Center of ExcellenceBurnaby, British Columbia, CanadaCity drinking waterQuantum annealing QPUs are cooled with dilution refrigerators (helium-3/helium-4 mixture) to roughly 10-15 mK, not water. Building HVAC uses municipal water; no disclosed process-water draw. Sources (12) →
Fermi America HyperGrid (Project Matador)AmarilloCity drinking waterMunicipal water off the Ogallala. Amarillo agreed to sell the campus 2.5 million gallons a day on a 20 year contract with two 10 year renewal options, at twice the rate a commercial user inside the city pays, and Fermi covers the cost of the two new Carson County wells the city needs to supply it. Fermi's own filing puts its expected need at up to 5.5 million gallons a day, and the city expects it back asking for that. Use is metered, but neither the water agreement nor the tax abatement says what happens if Fermi exceeds it. Sources (7) →
Google Quantum AI Campus Santa BarbaraGoleta, California, USACity drinking waterQuantum processors are cooled in dilution refrigerators (cryostats) to roughly 10 millikelvin using helium-3/helium-4 mixtures, not chilled water. Only ancillary building HVAC would draw municipal water; no facility-scale process-water use has been disclosed. Sources (9) →
IonQ Quantum Manufacturing Facility BothellBothell, Washington, USACity drinking waterTrapped-ion quantum systems do not use large-scale water cooling; ion trap chips operate in ultra-high-vacuum chambers at near room temperature, unlike superconducting qubits that require dilution refrigerators. No municipal water-cooling loop disclosed. Sources (9) →
xAI Colossus 2 Data CenterSouthavenCity drinking waterSits too far from the wastewater plant and draws millions of gallons/day of drinking water (about 1.3M gal/day as of early 2026); xAI has announced an ~$80M treatment plant to reuse ~13M gal/day of wastewater. Powered by on-site natural gas turbines. Sources (11) →

Water noted, no single method

A sourced water note that does not fit one clean method above.

54 tracked campuses

54 tracked campuses
AWS Center for Quantum Computing PasadenaPasadena, California, USAWater noted, no single methodNo industrial water cooling disclosed. Quantum processors on site (Ocelot cat-qubit chip) operate in dilution refrigerators at near-absolute-zero temperatures, which use closed-cycle helium (helium-3/helium-4) rather than facility water for cryogenic cooling. Sources (9) →
Alpha Digital Campus (LandBridge / PowerBridge)PecosWater noted, no single methodNot published. The announcement lists significant water availability among West Texas's advantages and says nothing further: no source, no volume, no arrangement, on a campus of about 3,400 acres. Sources (3) →
Amazon (AWS) Hermiston / Umatilla Data Center CampusHermistonWater noted, no single methodHermiston annexed 810 acres into its Urban Growth Boundary (South Hermiston Industrial Park) in Sept 2025 for future data centers. Region attractive for proximity to Columbia River water supply. Existing AWS load served via PacifiCorp. Sources (2) →
Atom Computing Boulder Quantum FacilityBoulder, Colorado, USAWater noted, no single methodNeutral-atom quantum systems trap and cool ytterbium atoms with lasers rather than dilution refrigerators, so the facility has no significant process-water or cryogenic-water load; cooling needs are limited to conventional HVAC and laser/electronics chillers. Sources (11) →
Cayuga Data CampusLansingWater noted, no single methodExisting industrial-scale water intake system at former coal plant; TeraWulf states it will NOT rely on Cayuga Lake to cool the data center Sources (2) →
Core Scientific / CoreWeave Muskogee HPC CampusMuskogeeWater noted, no single methodNot published. Core Scientific's own page for the site talks about power, connectivity and expansion room, and mentions cooling only as one of the things the facility provides. It names no cooling method, water source or volume. Sources (7) →
Data City (Energy Abundance)LaredoWater noted, no single methodNot published. The launch release describes a centralised district cooling system built around direct-to-chip liquid cooling, and says nothing about where the water comes from or how much is needed, on a 50,000 acre site in a part of Texas where that is the question. Sources (2) →
Dove Creek Data Center (Beacon)San AngeloWater noted, no single methodOff-grid; powered by on-site natural-gas reciprocating engines (RICE). ~1,240 acres of buildable land (est. 70% of total site). Facility sited 0.25 mi south of US 67 on FM 2335, west Tom Green County. Community concerns raised over water and power; water source not specified in permit reporting. Sources (2) →
How we know this

The big-picture numbers here come from outside research, and we name each one: a federal report for how the water use works, a US national lab for the electricity figures, a UC Riverside study for the per-question estimate, and public records for the one clear per-site number. The notes on how each site gets its cooling water come straight from that site's record on DEPLOY.

We track where each site gets its cooling water, which we can check, and we point to the research for the totals, which we cannot measure ourselves. We do not have an exact gallons number for a single site, and we do not claim one anywhere on this page.

Common questions

How much water does an AI data center use?
There is no single number. It can change by more than ten times from one site to the next, depending on how the building is cooled, the weather, and where its power comes from. Researchers have measured the big picture, and this page points to their work. We do not have an exact per-site number and will not publish one we cannot back up. What we do show is how each data center we track gets its cooling water.
Why do data centers need water at all?
To get rid of heat. Almost all the electricity a computer uses turns into heat, and that heat has to go somewhere. Letting water evaporate is a cheap way to carry it off, which is why many sites use cooling towers. It is not the only way. Air cooling, dry coolers, and sealed closed loops move the same heat with little or no water, and several sites we track are built that way.
Where does the water come from?
It depends on the site, and that is what we track. Some sites use regular city drinking water, which gets the most attention. Others use recycled water, seawater, or a sealed loop that only needs a top-off now and then. The table on this page sorts the sites we track by where their cooling water comes from.
Do data centers pollute the water they use?
Most cooling water either evaporates or gets returned, not turned into something toxic. The details depend on the system and any cleaning chemicals used, and what gets sent back out is controlled by water permits. We do not track the quality of the water a site sends back, so we do not claim anything about it. We track where the cooling water comes from.
Which data centers use the least water?
On our record, the sites that use the least are the ones cooled by air or dry systems, and the ones that run a sealed closed loop. Several of their operators say these use little or no water. The table on this page lists them by cooling method, each with a source. That is about the method they report, not a proven gallons ranking.
Does AI use more water than regular data centers?
AI packs a lot of computing, and a lot of heat, into a small space, which is why it has raised new worry about water. The estimates of AI's own water use come from outside research, and this page points to it. We track AI-scale sites and record how each one gets its cooling water. For the wider picture, see whether AI data centers are bad for the environment.

Keep reading

Ask the registry

Track this answer

Find out instantly when it changes.

Verified changes only. We check the record and link every source. No marketing.

Canonical URL: /do-ai-data-centers-use-water · machine-readable mirror: /do-ai-data-centers-use-water.md