Data center comparison
PORTS-Pike Technology Campus vs Stargate Lordstown
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| PORTS-Pike Technology Campus | Stargate Lordstown | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | 10 GW | 0.30 GW |
| Energized capacity | 0 GW | 0 GW |
| Announced-to-energized gap | 10 GW | 0.30 GW |
| Lifecycle | announced | announced |
| Developer | SB Energy | OpenAI |
| Location | Piketon, Ohio, United States | Lordstown, Ohio, United States |
| Grid | PJM | PJM |
| Acreage | not recorded | not recorded |
On the map
Common questions
Which is bigger, PORTS-Pike Technology Campus or Stargate Lordstown?
By announced capacity, PORTS-Pike Technology Campus is larger: 10 GW versus 0.30 GW. Announced figures are claims, not built capacity.
Which is further along, PORTS-Pike Technology Campus or Stargate Lordstown?
PORTS-Pike Technology Campus is announced; Stargate Lordstown is announced. Energized capacity: 0 GW versus 0 GW. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are PORTS-Pike Technology Campus and Stargate Lordstown?
PORTS-Pike Technology Campus is in Piketon, Ohio, United States; Stargate Lordstown is in Lordstown, Ohio, United States. Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.