Data center comparison
PORTS-Pike Technology Campus vs Stargate Doña Ana County / Project Jupiter
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| PORTS-Pike Technology Campus | Stargate Doña Ana County / Project Jupiter | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | 10 GW | 2.20 GW |
| Energized capacity | 0 GW | 0 GW |
| Announced-to-energized gap | 10 GW | 2.20 GW |
| Lifecycle | announced | under construction |
| Developer | SB Energy | STACK Infrastructure |
| Location | Piketon, Ohio, United States | Santa Teresa, New Mexico, United States |
| Grid | PJM | WECC |
| Acreage | not recorded | 1,400 acres |
On the map
Common questions
Which is bigger, PORTS-Pike Technology Campus or Stargate Doña Ana County / Project Jupiter?
By announced capacity, PORTS-Pike Technology Campus is larger: 10 GW versus 2.20 GW. Announced figures are claims, not built capacity.
Which is further along, PORTS-Pike Technology Campus or Stargate Doña Ana County / Project Jupiter?
PORTS-Pike Technology Campus is announced; Stargate Doña Ana County / Project Jupiter is under construction. Energized capacity: 0 GW versus 0 GW. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are PORTS-Pike Technology Campus and Stargate Doña Ana County / Project Jupiter?
PORTS-Pike Technology Campus is in Piketon, Ohio, United States; Stargate Doña Ana County / Project Jupiter is in Santa Teresa, New Mexico, United States. Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.