Data center comparison
Microsoft Cheyenne Data Center Campus vs Microsoft Fairwater Data Center
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| Microsoft Cheyenne Data Center Campus | Microsoft Fairwater Data Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | not recorded | 0.45 GW |
| Energized capacity | not recorded | 0.37 GW |
| Announced-to-energized gap | not recorded | 0.08 GW |
| Lifecycle | energized | partially energized |
| Developer | Microsoft | Microsoft / OpenAI |
| Location | Cheyenne, Wyoming, United States | Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, United States |
| Grid | WECC | MISO |
| Acreage | 3,200 acres | not recorded |
On the map
Common questions
Which is further along, Microsoft Cheyenne Data Center Campus or Microsoft Fairwater Data Center?
Microsoft Cheyenne Data Center Campus is energized; Microsoft Fairwater Data Center is partially energized. Energized capacity: not recorded versus 0.37 GW. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are Microsoft Cheyenne Data Center Campus and Microsoft Fairwater Data Center?
Microsoft Cheyenne Data Center Campus is in Cheyenne, Wyoming, United States; Microsoft Fairwater Data Center is in Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, United States. Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.