Data center comparison
Project Llano vs Crusoe Tulsa AI Factory
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| Project Llano | Crusoe Tulsa AI Factory | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Energized capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Announced-to-energized gap | not recorded | not recorded |
| Lifecycle | under construction | energized |
| Developer | Crusoe | Crusoe |
| Location | Armstrong, Texas, United States | Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA (first full-scale US metro operation) |
| Grid | ERCOT | not recorded |
| Acreage | not recorded | not recorded |
On the map
Common questions
Which is further along, Project Llano or Crusoe Tulsa AI Factory?
Project Llano is under construction; Crusoe Tulsa AI Factory is energized. Energized capacity: not recorded versus not recorded. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are Project Llano and Crusoe Tulsa AI Factory?
Project Llano is in Armstrong, Texas, United States; Crusoe Tulsa AI Factory is in Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA (first full-scale US metro operation). Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.