Data center comparison
Meta Beaver Dam Data Center vs Meta Social Circle / Stanton Springs Data Center
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| Meta Beaver Dam Data Center | Meta Social Circle / Stanton Springs Data Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | 0.22 GW | 0.25 GW |
| Energized capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Announced-to-energized gap | 0.22 GW | 0.25 GW |
| Lifecycle | under construction | partially energized |
| Developer | Meta Platforms | Meta Platforms |
| Location | Beaver Dam, Wisconsin, United States | Social Circle, Georgia, United States |
| Grid | MISO | other |
| Acreage | not recorded | 628 acres |
On the map
Common questions
Which is bigger, Meta Beaver Dam Data Center or Meta Social Circle / Stanton Springs Data Center?
By announced capacity, Meta Social Circle / Stanton Springs Data Center is larger: 0.25 GW versus 0.22 GW. Announced figures are claims, not built capacity.
Which is further along, Meta Beaver Dam Data Center or Meta Social Circle / Stanton Springs Data Center?
Meta Beaver Dam Data Center is under construction; Meta Social Circle / Stanton Springs Data Center is partially energized. Energized capacity: not recorded versus not recorded. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are Meta Beaver Dam Data Center and Meta Social Circle / Stanton Springs Data Center?
Meta Beaver Dam Data Center is in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin, United States; Meta Social Circle / Stanton Springs Data Center is in Social Circle, Georgia, United States. Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.