Data center comparison
Crusoe Stargate Site 2 vs Lancium Fort Stockton Clean Campus
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| Crusoe Stargate Site 2 | Lancium Fort Stockton Clean Campus | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | not recorded | 0.33 GW |
| Energized capacity | not recorded | 0.03 GW |
| Announced-to-energized gap | not recorded | 0.30 GW |
| Lifecycle | under construction | partially energized |
| Developer | Crusoe | Lancium |
| Location | Albany (Shackelford County), Texas, United States | Fort Stockton, Texas, United States |
| Grid | ERCOT | ERCOT |
| Acreage | not recorded | 110 acres |
On the map
Common questions
Which is further along, Crusoe Stargate Site 2 or Lancium Fort Stockton Clean Campus?
Crusoe Stargate Site 2 is under construction; Lancium Fort Stockton Clean Campus is partially energized. Energized capacity: not recorded versus 0.03 GW. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are Crusoe Stargate Site 2 and Lancium Fort Stockton Clean Campus?
Crusoe Stargate Site 2 is in Albany (Shackelford County), Texas, United States; Lancium Fort Stockton Clean Campus is in Fort Stockton, Texas, United States. Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.