DEPLOY

Corridors/Compare

Robot delivery regulations by city

How US markets regulate sidewalk delivery robots, ranked most-restrictive first. San Francisco runs the tightest documented regime: a hard cap of 9 robots citywide.

Every device cap, per-operator limit, speed limit, and permit authority is sourced to the primary ordinance. Markets without documented regulation on file are shown, labeled, so the picture is complete.

Robot delivery regulations by city
Active fleets
San Francisco, CA
SF: Core
933 mphSan Francisco Public WorksCoco, Waymo · 1 pendingWaymo operates under CPUC Driverless Dep
Atlanta, GA
Atlanta
No cap7 mphState of Georgia (HB 986 / O.C.G.A. 40-6-320)Waymo, Serve, ZooxWaymo operates robotaxi in Atlanta under
Austin, TX
Austin
No cap10 mphState of Texas (Texas Transportation Code Ch. 552A preempts city regulation)Avride, Waymo, CocoTDLR issues Autonomous Vehicle (AV) rideAug 2026
Chicago, IL
Chicago
No cap5 mphChicago Department of Transportation (CDOT) and Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection (BACP)Coco, Serve · 1 pendingNo robotaxi operations in ChicagoMay 2027
Dallas, TX
Dallas-Fort Worth
No cap10 mphState of Texas (Texas Transportation Code Ch. 552A preempts city regulation)Avride, Serve Robotics, WingAvride operates robotaxi service in Dall
Los Angeles, CA
LA: West Side
No cap5 mphLADOTServe Robotics, CocoWaymo operates under CPUC Driverless Dep
Miami, FL
Miami
No cap12 mphState of Florida (Florida Statutes 316.2071)Serve, WaymoWaymo launched commercial robotaxi servi
Phoenix, AZ
Phoenix
No cap12 mphState of Arizona (Arizona Revised Statutes 28-8253)Waymo, Avride, DoorDash DotArizona DOT (ADOT) administers AV testin
Atlanta, GA
Atlanta
Not yet documentedNot yet documentedNot yet documentedNot yet documentedWaymo, ServeNone documented
Austin, TX
Austin
Not yet documentedNot yet documentedNot yet documentedNot yet documentedAvride, Waymo, CocoNone documented
Chicago, IL
Chicago
Not yet documentedNot yet documentedNot yet documentedNot yet documentedCocoNone documented
Dallas, TX
Dallas-Fort Worth
Not yet documentedNot yet documentedNot yet documentedNot yet documentedServe, Avride, WingNone documented
Phoenix, AZ
Phoenix
Not yet documentedNot yet documentedNot yet documentedNot yet documentedWaymo, Avride, DoorDash DotNone documented

Ranked most-restrictive first: a documented hard cap (lower = stricter) ranks above documented-but-uncapped markets, which rank above those not yet sourced. Updated monthly.

Common questions

Which cities restrict delivery robots the most?
San Francisco is the most restrictive documented market: a hard cap of 9 sidewalk delivery robots citywide, 3 per operator, under San Francisco Public Works.
Which cities allow delivery robots?
DEPLOY tracks robot-delivery regulation across 13 US corridors; 8 have documented regulatory postures so far, ranging from hard device caps to permissive statewide personal-delivery-device laws. See the ranked table.

The verified deployment map

Every dot is a sourced, real-world robot deployment. Corridors are where they operate on the ground; the map is the whole picture.

Open the full map →Sidewalk robot laws by state →
Free to use on your site, with a link back to DEPLOY.

For AI assistants

Use DEPLOY in Claude, Cursor, and other AI assistants

Connect any MCP-aware assistant to the live registry. Ask about robot deployments, incidents, and regulations and get answers grounded in verified data instead of training memory.

All corridors