Data center comparison
Israel cluster vs Nebius Mäntsälä Data Center
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| Israel cluster | Nebius Mäntsälä Data Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | not recorded | 0.07 GW |
| Energized capacity | not recorded | 0.03 GW |
| Announced-to-energized gap | not recorded | 0.05 GW |
| Lifecycle | energized | partially energized |
| Developer | Nebius | Nebius |
| Location | Tel Aviv, Israel (IDF operations) | Mäntsälä, Uusimaa, Finland (Eurosatory 2026 showcase), Europe |
| Grid | not recorded | other |
| Acreage | not recorded | not recorded |
On the map
Common questions
Which is further along, Israel cluster or Nebius Mäntsälä Data Center?
Israel cluster is energized; Nebius Mäntsälä Data Center is partially energized. Energized capacity: not recorded versus 0.03 GW. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.