Data center comparison
Project Kilby vs Crusoe Stargate Site 2
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| Project Kilby | Crusoe Stargate Site 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | 2.70 GW | not recorded |
| Energized capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Announced-to-energized gap | 2.70 GW | not recorded |
| Lifecycle | announced | under construction |
| Developer | Chevron Corporation | Crusoe |
| Location | Pecos, Texas, United States | Albany (Shackelford County), Texas, United States |
| Grid | ERCOT | ERCOT |
| Acreage | 2,000 acres | not recorded |
On the map
Common questions
Which is further along, Project Kilby or Crusoe Stargate Site 2?
Project Kilby is announced; Crusoe Stargate Site 2 is under construction. Energized capacity: not recorded versus not recorded. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are Project Kilby and Crusoe Stargate Site 2?
Project Kilby is in Pecos, Texas, United States; Crusoe Stargate Site 2 is in Albany (Shackelford County), Texas, United States. Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.