Data center comparison
AirTrunk MEL1 vs AirTrunk OSK1
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| AirTrunk MEL1 | AirTrunk OSK1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Energized capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Announced-to-energized gap | not recorded | not recorded |
| Lifecycle | energized | under construction |
| Developer | AirTrunk | AirTrunk |
| Location | Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | Osaka, Japan (Kansai International Airport) |
| Grid | not recorded | not recorded |
| Acreage | not recorded | not recorded |
On the map
Common questions
Which is further along, AirTrunk MEL1 or AirTrunk OSK1?
AirTrunk MEL1 is energized; AirTrunk OSK1 is under construction. Energized capacity: not recorded versus not recorded. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are AirTrunk MEL1 and AirTrunk OSK1?
AirTrunk MEL1 is in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; AirTrunk OSK1 is in Osaka, Japan (Kansai International Airport). Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.