DEPLOY

Buying guide

Hugo RAS vs mBos TKA System in 2026

Comparing 2 humanoid robots across availability, pricing, capabilities, and verified deployments. Current as of 2026.

Key differences

On DEPLOY's record, Hugo RAS is further along: at the commercial stage versus mBos TKA System at the research stage, as of 2026.

  • Hugo RAS has more verified real-world deployments (4 vs 1).
  • Hugo RAS is at the commercial stage; mBos TKA System at the research stage.
Attribute
ManufacturerMedtronicMonogram Technologies
Form factorsurgicalsurgical
Maturitycommercialresearch
Autonomy◐ not independently verified
Availabilityinternal-onlyenterpriseinternal-onlyenterprise
PriceNot announcedNot announced
Capability claims
  • Assists surgery (teleoperated-assisted, claimed)
Brain
Verified deployments41Monogram Technologies
Privacy practices
Sources on file189

Track this matchup

Get told the moment Hugo RAS or mBos TKA System changes. Verified changes only, the second they are real. No press-release noise.

Hugo RAS

Verified changes only. No press-release noise.

mBos TKA System

Verified changes only. No press-release noise.

Editorial summaries

Hugo RAS

Medtronic's Hugo RAS is a modular, multi-port teleoperated robotic-assisted-surgery system and the main commercial competitor to Intuitive's da Vinci. It is CE-marked in Europe (urology and gynecology, October 2021) and US FDA-cleared for urology only (December 2025: prostatectomy, nephrectomy, cystectomy); US general-surgery and gynecology indications are planned but not yet cleared.

It is teleoperated with no shipped intraoperative AI. Medtronic does not disclose a Hugo installed-base count, so DEPLOY records honest absence rather than an invented number. It is enterprise B2B equipment; there is no consumer price.

mBos TKA System

The Monogram mBos TKA System is a robotic total-knee-arthroplasty platform from Monogram Technologies, a Zimmer Biomet subsidiary since October 2025. It is the autonomy-boundary case of DEPLOY's surgical cluster: unlike the AI-augmented, surgeon-controlled systems (Stryker Mako, Smith+Nephew CORI, Zimmer Biomet ROSA), where the surgeon makes the cuts, the cleared mBos is semi-autonomous, with a robotic arm (built on a KUKA arm) executing the bone cuts itself under AI control within a surgeon-approved, patient-specific CT-based plan and active surgeon supervision.

There is no consumer price: it is pre-commercial enterprise surgical equipment that has not sold any units. Several verified-vs-claimed cap-flags matter. It received FDA 510(k) clearance on March 17, 2025, but the exact K-number could not be independently verified, and the 'semi-autonomous' characterization is sourced to Zimmer Biomet and trade coverage rather than the FDA letter (Monogram's own clearance release described it more softly as robotic-assisted TKA).

A separate fully-autonomous, hands-free, saw-based version is not FDA cleared and remains in development, targeted around late 2027 or 2028; its first live-patient procedure (July 26, 2025, Ahmedabad, India) was under an India CDSCO 102-procedure investigation, not US FDA, a single index case with no verified peer-reviewed outcomes. Monogram was founded by orthopedic surgeon Dr.

Doug Unis (chief medical officer and founder, not CEO; the pre-acquisition CEO was Benjamin Sexson) and was acquired by Zimmer Biomet at about $168M enterprise value plus contingent value rights, with commercialization alongside Zimmer Biomet implants targeted for early 2027. The registry records it at research maturity: cleared but pre-commercial, with its headline fully-autonomous capability still in development.

Common questions

How do Hugo RAS and mBos TKA System differ?
On DEPLOY's record, Hugo RAS is further along: at the commercial stage versus mBos TKA System at the research stage, as of 2026. Hugo RAS has more verified real-world deployments (4 vs 1). Hugo RAS is at the commercial stage; mBos TKA System at the research stage.
What is the difference between Hugo RAS and mBos TKA System?
Hugo RAS and mBos TKA System are both surgical robots on the DEPLOY registry. They differ in maker, maturity, price, verified deployments, and how much of their autonomy is independently verified. See the table above for the full head-to-head; each figure is sourced.
Is Hugo RAS or mBos TKA System more autonomous?
On the DEPLOY registry, neither Hugo RAS nor mBos TKA System has capabilities independently verified as fully autonomous yet; their recorded capabilities are teleoperated-assisted, demonstrated, or vendor-claimed. See the table for each capability's verification status.
Which has more verified deployments, Hugo RAS or mBos TKA System?
Hugo RAS has more verified deployments (4) on the DEPLOY registry than mBos TKA System (1). DEPLOY counts a deployment only when confirmed at a named site with a primary source.

Recent coverage

Related comparisons

Keep researching

Ask the registry

For AI assistants

Use DEPLOY in Claude, Cursor, and other AI assistants

Connect any MCP-aware assistant to the live registry. Ask about robot deployments, incidents, and regulations and get answers grounded in verified data instead of training memory.


Machine-readable: this page as markdown.

← Back to all consumer robots