DEPLOY

Buying guide

da Vinci (and Ion) vs Stryker Mako SmartRobotics in 2026

Comparing 2 humanoid robots across availability, pricing, capabilities, and verified deployments. Current as of 2026.

Key differences

On DEPLOY's record, da Vinci (and Ion) is further along: at the production stage versus Stryker Mako SmartRobotics at the commercial stage, as of 2026.

  • Stryker Mako SmartRobotics has the lower recorded price.
  • da Vinci (and Ion) has more verified real-world deployments (13 vs 7).
  • da Vinci (and Ion) is at the production stage; Stryker Mako SmartRobotics at the commercial stage.
Attribute
ManufacturerIntuitive SurgicalStryker
Form factorsurgicalsurgical
Maturityproductioncommercial
Autonomy◐ not independently verified◐ not independently verified
Availabilityinternal-onlyenterpriseinternal-onlyenterprise
Price$1,800,000-$2,500,000 (analyst estimate) or $1,500,000-$2,500,000 (actual sale price)$1,000,000-$1,500,000 (actual sale price)
Capability claims
  • Assists surgery (teleoperated-assisted, verified)
  • Assists surgery (teleoperated-assisted, verified)
Brain
Verified deployments137
Privacy practices
Sources on file2915

Track this matchup

Get told the moment da Vinci (and Ion) or Stryker Mako SmartRobotics changes. Verified changes only, the second they are real. No press-release noise.

da Vinci (and Ion)

Verified changes only. No press-release noise.

Stryker Mako SmartRobotics

Verified changes only. No press-release noise.

Editorial summaries

da Vinci (and Ion)

Intuitive Surgical's da Vinci is the gold-standard surgical robot and the verified-at-scale anchor of the category. Per Intuitive's SEC filings, 11,395 da Vinci systems and 1,041 Ion endoluminal systems are installed. The lineup spans da Vinci multi-port (X/Xi), the single-port SP, and the fifth-generation da Vinci 5 (FDA cleared March 2024, with force feedback), plus the Ion bronchoscopy robot (FDA 2019).

It is teleoperated, a surgeon controls every motion, with shipped analytics AI; autonomous-suturing work exists only as research demos on da Vinci hardware, not as shipped product. It is enterprise B2B equipment sold to hospitals at multi-million-dollar per-system prices; there is no consumer price.

Stryker Mako SmartRobotics

Stryker's Mako (Mako SmartRobotics) is a surgeon-guided robotic arm for orthopedic joint replacement and the large-footprint, CT-based, multi-procedure archetype of DEPLOY's orthopedic surgical sub-cohort. It pairs CT-based 3D pre-operative planning with intra-operative haptic boundary control (AccuStop physically constrains the saw or burr to the planned resection zone) and real-time optical bone tracking.

Critically, it is AI-augmented but surgeon-controlled, not autonomous: the surgeon holds and guides the arm and makes every cut; the robot does not move or cut on its own, the same assistive class as Intuitive's da Vinci. Cleared procedures span partial and total knee (total knee August 2015), cementless total knee, total hip and a hip-revision feature, Mako Spine (510(k) K241517, May 2024, pedicle-screw placement) and Mako Shoulder 1.0 (510(k) K242373, November 2024, reverse shoulder arthroplasty).

Sold in 45-plus countries by Stryker (NYSE: SYK). Cap-flag: Stryker frames itself in SEC filings as one of four leading global competitors, not a specific market-share percentage; aggregator share figures are not verified. As enterprise B2B surgical equipment, there is no consumer price.

Common questions

How do da Vinci (and Ion) and Stryker Mako SmartRobotics differ?
On DEPLOY's record, da Vinci (and Ion) is further along: at the production stage versus Stryker Mako SmartRobotics at the commercial stage, as of 2026. Stryker Mako SmartRobotics has the lower recorded price. da Vinci (and Ion) has more verified real-world deployments (13 vs 7). da Vinci (and Ion) is at the production stage; Stryker Mako SmartRobotics at the commercial stage.
What is the difference between da Vinci (and Ion) and Stryker Mako SmartRobotics?
da Vinci (and Ion) and Stryker Mako SmartRobotics are both surgical robots on the DEPLOY registry. They differ in maker, maturity, price, verified deployments, and how much of their autonomy is independently verified. See the table above for the full head-to-head; each figure is sourced.
Which is cheaper, da Vinci (and Ion) or Stryker Mako SmartRobotics?
Stryker Mako SmartRobotics has the lower recorded price on the DEPLOY registry than da Vinci (and Ion). Prices are sourced; see each record for whether the figure is a manufacturer target, an estimate, or an actual sale price.
Is da Vinci (and Ion) or Stryker Mako SmartRobotics more autonomous?
On the DEPLOY registry, neither da Vinci (and Ion) nor Stryker Mako SmartRobotics has capabilities independently verified as fully autonomous yet; their recorded capabilities are teleoperated-assisted, demonstrated, or vendor-claimed. See the table for each capability's verification status.
Which has more verified deployments, da Vinci (and Ion) or Stryker Mako SmartRobotics?
da Vinci (and Ion) has more verified deployments (13) on the DEPLOY registry than Stryker Mako SmartRobotics (7). DEPLOY counts a deployment only when confirmed at a named site with a primary source.

Recent coverage

Related comparisons

Keep researching

Ask the registry

For AI assistants

Use DEPLOY in Claude, Cursor, and other AI assistants

Connect any MCP-aware assistant to the live registry. Ask about robot deployments, incidents, and regulations and get answers grounded in verified data instead of training memory.


Machine-readable: this page as markdown.

← Back to all consumer robots