DEPLOY

Buying guide

mBos TKA System vs Johnson & Johnson Ottava in 2026

Comparing 2 humanoid robots across availability, pricing, capabilities, and verified deployments. Current as of 2026.

Key differences

On DEPLOY's record, Johnson & Johnson Ottava is further along: at the commercial stage versus mBos TKA System at the research stage, as of 2026.

  • Johnson & Johnson Ottava has more verified real-world deployments (3 vs 1).
  • mBos TKA System is at the research stage; Johnson & Johnson Ottava at the commercial stage.
Attribute
ManufacturerMonogram TechnologiesJohnson & Johnson
Form factorsurgicalsurgical
Maturityresearchcommercial
Autonomy
Availabilityinternal-onlyenterpriseinternal-onlyenterprise
PriceNot announcedNot announced
Capability claims
Brain
Verified deployments1Monogram Technologies3
Privacy practices
Sources on file94

Track this matchup

Get told the moment mBos TKA System or Johnson & Johnson Ottava changes. Verified changes only, the second they are real. No press-release noise.

mBos TKA System

Verified changes only. No press-release noise.

Johnson & Johnson Ottava

Verified changes only. No press-release noise.

Editorial summaries

mBos TKA System

The Monogram mBos TKA System is a robotic total-knee-arthroplasty platform from Monogram Technologies, a Zimmer Biomet subsidiary since October 2025. It is the autonomy-boundary case of DEPLOY's surgical cluster: unlike the AI-augmented, surgeon-controlled systems (Stryker Mako, Smith+Nephew CORI, Zimmer Biomet ROSA), where the surgeon makes the cuts, the cleared mBos is semi-autonomous, with a robotic arm (built on a KUKA arm) executing the bone cuts itself under AI control within a surgeon-approved, patient-specific CT-based plan and active surgeon supervision.

There is no consumer price: it is pre-commercial enterprise surgical equipment that has not sold any units. Several verified-vs-claimed cap-flags matter. It received FDA 510(k) clearance on March 17, 2025, but the exact K-number could not be independently verified, and the 'semi-autonomous' characterization is sourced to Zimmer Biomet and trade coverage rather than the FDA letter (Monogram's own clearance release described it more softly as robotic-assisted TKA).

A separate fully-autonomous, hands-free, saw-based version is not FDA cleared and remains in development, targeted around late 2027 or 2028; its first live-patient procedure (July 26, 2025, Ahmedabad, India) was under an India CDSCO 102-procedure investigation, not US FDA, a single index case with no verified peer-reviewed outcomes. Monogram was founded by orthopedic surgeon Dr.

Doug Unis (chief medical officer and founder, not CEO; the pre-acquisition CEO was Benjamin Sexson) and was acquired by Zimmer Biomet at about $168M enterprise value plus contingent value rights, with commercialization alongside Zimmer Biomet implants targeted for early 2027. The registry records it at research maturity: cleared but pre-commercial, with its headline fully-autonomous capability still in development.

Johnson & Johnson Ottava

J&J MedTech's Ottava is a soft-tissue general-surgery robotic platform with four arms integrated into the operating table, announced in 2020. It is pre-market: J&J submitted a De Novo request to the FDA in January 2026, and Ottava is not authorized to be marketed. DEPLOY classifies it research tier: J&J's corporate scale does not translate into verified surgical-robotics deployment, because the gating event (FDA clearance) has not occurred.

By the framework, Ottava sits at the same research tier as far smaller pre-market entrants. There is no price; it is not sold.

Common questions

How do mBos TKA System and Johnson & Johnson Ottava differ?
On DEPLOY's record, Johnson & Johnson Ottava is further along: at the commercial stage versus mBos TKA System at the research stage, as of 2026. Johnson & Johnson Ottava has more verified real-world deployments (3 vs 1). mBos TKA System is at the research stage; Johnson & Johnson Ottava at the commercial stage.
What is the difference between mBos TKA System and Johnson & Johnson Ottava?
mBos TKA System and Johnson & Johnson Ottava are both surgical robots on the DEPLOY registry. They differ in maker, maturity, price, verified deployments, and how much of their autonomy is independently verified. See the table above for the full head-to-head; each figure is sourced.
Which has more verified deployments, mBos TKA System or Johnson & Johnson Ottava?
Johnson & Johnson Ottava has more verified deployments (3) on the DEPLOY registry than mBos TKA System (1). DEPLOY counts a deployment only when confirmed at a named site with a primary source.

Recent coverage

Related comparisons

Keep researching

Ask the registry

For AI assistants

Use DEPLOY in Claude, Cursor, and other AI assistants

Connect any MCP-aware assistant to the live registry. Ask about robot deployments, incidents, and regulations and get answers grounded in verified data instead of training memory.


Machine-readable: this page as markdown.

← Back to all consumer robots