Buying guide
Apollo vs Fourier GR-2 in 2026
Comparing 2 humanoid robots across availability, pricing, capabilities, and verified deployments. Current as of 2026.
Key differences
- Apollo has more capabilities independently verified as autonomous (1 vs 0).
- Apollo has more verified real-world deployments (4 vs 0).
- Apollo is at the commercial stage; Fourier GR-2 at the research stage.
| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apptronik | Fourier Intelligence |
| Form factor | humanoid | humanoid |
| Maturity | commercial | research |
| Autonomy | ✓ 1 verified autonomous | ◐ not independently verified |
| Availability | internal-onlyenterprise | internal-onlyenterprise |
| Price | Not announced | Not announced |
| Capability claims |
|
|
| Brain |
| — |
| Verified deployments | 4 | 0 |
| Privacy practices | — | — |
| Sources on file | 35 | 6 |
Editorial summaries
Apollo
Apptronik is positioning Apollo for enterprise logistics and manufacturing rather than consumer or research use. The named-operator pilots span three OEMs across automotive (Mercedes-Benz Digital Factory Berlin), contract manufacturing (Jabil), and warehouse distribution (GXO); the Jabil deployment is dual-mode, with Jabil both manufacturing Apollo for Apptronik and operating it in their own facilities. Apptronik describes Apollo as production-ready for these contexts, but the verifiable scope is what customer publications confirm, not the breadth Apptronik claims. None of the deployments are yet at commercial scale; each is an integration pilot demonstrating fit at one site.
Fourier GR-2
Fourier's GR-2 (from Fourier Intelligence, Shanghai) is a second-generation bipedal research humanoid (GRx generation 2, 2024). DEPLOY records it at research maturity with no verified deployments: it is a development and demonstration platform, not a commercial-deployment-at-scale product. As a research platform it has no consumer price. Cap-flag: most Chinese-humanoid commercial-deployment framing in this cohort, GR-2 included, is aspirational demonstration; the verification posture is demonstration, not verified autonomous deployment.
Common questions
- What is the difference between Apollo and Fourier GR-2?
- Apollo and Fourier GR-2 are both humanoid robots on the DEPLOY registry. They differ in maker, maturity, price, verified deployments, and how much of their autonomy is independently verified. See the table above for the full head-to-head; each figure is sourced.
- Is Apollo or Fourier GR-2 more autonomous?
- Apollo has more capabilities independently verified as autonomous on the DEPLOY registry than Fourier GR-2. DEPLOY counts a capability as autonomous only when verified at a real deployment, not from a demo or a vendor claim.
- Which has more verified deployments, Apollo or Fourier GR-2?
- Apollo has more verified deployments (4) on the DEPLOY registry than Fourier GR-2 (0). DEPLOY counts a deployment only when confirmed at a named site with a primary source.
Recent coverage
- Private Capital Is Plugging State Spending Gap, Apollo's Zelter SaysApollo · Bloomberg Technology · 2026-07-14
- Ex-NASA boss points out small flaw in Moon landing plan: No landerApollo · The Register · 2026-07-08
- 34 Best Humanoid Robots [2026 Ranked] - RoboZapsFourier GR-2 · Google News · 2026-06-10
- Most Advanced Humanoid Robots You Can Buy in 2026 (Ranked) - RoboZapsFourier GR-2 · Google News · 2026-06-10
Related comparisons
- NEO vs Fourier GR-2
- AEON vs Fourier GR-2
- AgiBot Yuanzheng A2 vs Fourier GR-2
- Astribot S1 vs Fourier GR-2
- Booster T1 vs Fourier GR-2
- Atlas vs Fourier GR-2
- Clone Protoclone vs Fourier GR-2
- Digit vs Fourier GR-2
- EngineAI SE01 vs Fourier GR-2
- Ameca vs Fourier GR-2
- Figure 03 vs Fourier GR-2
- Fourier GR-2 vs Fourier GR-3
For AI assistants
Use DEPLOY in Claude, Cursor, and other AI assistants
Connect any MCP-aware assistant to the live registry. Ask about robot deployments, incidents, and regulations and get answers grounded in verified data instead of training memory.
Machine-readable: this page as markdown.

